I. GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
Ms. Krummenacker occupies a small classroom,
measuring approximately 1200 square feet (40 x 30), equipped with two teachers'
desks, wall-cabinets, shelving and 15 student desks. Ample books, manuals, art
supplies and visual aids seem available. A large glossy board designed for use
with felt markers is positioned at the front of the classroom, requiring
frequent wash-downs with a dampened cloth to remove writing.
Student desks are spaced uncomfortably close
to each other creating a sense of proximity which is not conducive to learning.
This problem is further compounded by the special status of Ms. Krummenacker's
students, many of whom are behaviorally disturbed, and, hence, disruptive and
disorderly.
Ms. Krummenacker teaches Remedial Language
Arts and
Students are frequently excused from class
for a variety of reasons, disrupting continuity of the class session for
themselves, the instructor and others. Purchase of meal tickets, appointments
with (apparently ineffective) counselors, disciplinary trips to the assistant
principal, rest room visits, library passes, and school nurse excuses seem to
serve as reasons for absence from class.
There is a Spanish-speaking classroom aide
who assists the Instructor with routine classroom organization. She also
assists in the motivation of students to learn and in completion of authorized
portions of the students' assignments. Neither she nor the instructor, however,
seems to be able to control the second period class adequately due to the
dynamics of student interaction.
The first period class, perhaps because a
morning Television Broadcast, School Announcements and the Pledge of Allegiance
occupy one third of classroom time, seems better able to attend to classroom
material being presented over a relatively brief span of time. Generally
speaking, the incidence of misbehavior was markedly reduced in the first period
class, in comparison with the second.
On day two, even in the presence of a new
speaker, the students during first period, however, were inattentive to
vocabulary and thematic material being presented by the guest instructor. While
some were responsive, there were also spontaneous outbursts and disruptions.
Talking among the students during presentation of material was a further
indication of inattentiveness and disinterest. Themes included Japanese
Motorcycles, Current Events and Sports, all of which would normally prove of
interest to students in this category and age-bracket. The class eventually
divided into three segments with one adult assuming responsibility for
continuing the lesson in each of the three sub-groups. Brief content-heavy
compositions were to be initiated by the two teachers and aide, and then,
hopefully, completed by the students.
During second period, no classroom decorum
was maintained on either the first day or second day of observation. On the
first day, three disruptive Latino boys were excused from class to work at
computer consoles with the guest instructor. Ms. Krummenacker then proceeded
with the lesson for the remaining students. The three boys were taken to the
Library to draft a paragraph for typing at a later time on the computer. All
three worked diligently on assigned material, although one had to be motivated
to do so by granting permission for him to peruse a HOT ROD magazine upon
completion of task. Although the boys did not type their material on the
computer, preferring to browse the Internet, the handwritten work accomplished
was submitted to the instructor for review at the end of the period.
Period two, the following day, however,
proved to be quite disruptive. The guest instructor, because of functional
fluency in Spanish and a graduate degree in counseling, was once again given
responsibility for the same three Latino boys. They preferred to work in the
computer lab. The guest instructor had prepared an Internet Web Site for them,
dealing with an environmental issue, a natural history lesson and substance
abuse. Click here: Lesson
Site. The boys initially seemed
to enjoy this "paragraph completion" site, and one of the three
completed the assigned task. The remaining two boys, however, mid-way through
their task, requested permission to use the rest room. Permission was granted.
When they returned, the guest instructor observed an asthma inhaler in the
possession of one of the boys. Its contents did not seem medicinal. Neither boy
performed his tasks properly during the remainder of the period. The guest
instructor had difficulty controlling the behavior of two of the boys who,
frustrated with the computer which they could not properly operate, ran, in the
last seven minutes of the period, from the computer classroom to join
classmates on the play yard. Ms. Krummenacker was displeased that they had
declined to remain with the guest instructor, but no disciplinary action for
either possession of the inhaler, or for running from the computer room seemed
indicated or justified in the eyes of either instructor.
II.
OBSERVATION OF INDIVIDUAL STUDENTS
III.
RECOMMENDATIONS
It is clear, upon cursory examination, to any
professional educator that the Las Cruces School District is not willing to
expend funds necessary to properly salvage the thousands of Special Ed students
currently channeled into remedial programs at all levels of its system. Given
the budgetary realities, imposed by the community on its own school system,
which have resulted in (1) understaffed special education classrooms, (2)
limited space per pupil, (3) deficient mentoring, (4) inadequate guidance and
psychological support for these students, and (5) counter-productive curriculum
preparation and IEP formulation, these students will become permanent burdens
on society in the years ahead. Since the District must be aware of these
problems, and has lobbied for additional funding through local governmental
channels without success, it cannot be validly held responsible for the
mediocre performance of its system.
Where does this scenario leave the special ed
students at ZIA? In the absence of a larger classroom, staffed with two
professionals trained at the graduate level in Special Education, Guidance, or
Remedial Curriculum Development, the relative chaos which was observed for two
days throughout the morning will continue unabated. The interaction between and
among disruptive students in this classroom is clearly interferring with
learning. It has been established, in numerous journal articles, that Special
Ed students, with varying levels of proficiency in a wide variety of
disciplines, can learn, can assimilate material and can remain on task when
ambient conditions are conducive to absorption of subject matter being
presented. There must be an attempt made to create those conditions.
Ms. Krummenacker is coping professionally and
competently with these students insofar as she is able. However, the classroom
aide, also a woman, is ineffective in securing the respect of the male Latino
students who refer to her disparagingly. While she may be able to maintain
discipline at times in the classroom, so teaching can proceed, disruptions
recur frequently and sharp exchanges take place among students, teacher and
aide. Those students (Kip, Cisco, O.B., Esmeralda) who wish to learn are unable
to do so.
The foregoing comments result, keeping in
mind the unfortunate realities of imposed budgetary restrictions, in the
following recommendations:
1. To supplement Ms. Krummenacker's presence,
placement of a Bilingual Male Role Model, either as an Auxiliary Instructor, or as an
un-degreed Aide, in the classroom is recommended to offset the disruptive
behaviors of Juan, Vincente and Joseph, among others. This can be accomplished
by transfer of the present Aide, and reassignment of a male to Ms.
Krummenacker's classroom.
2. Recommended, as well, is Review of Disruptive Students' IEPs with a view toward devising a viable strategy for
coping with disciplinary problems and outbursts. This should not result in
expulsion of these students or in their transfer to an alternative educational
setting. Adjustments in the amount of time they must stay in a single classroom
should be made. Experience has demonstrated that Period Two is far too long for
Juan and Vincente to remain in a single room, whatever is being discussed. The
computer option is viable, assuming a bilingual instructor is available and
computer-literate.
3. Consideration must be given to seriously
attempting to Redirect the Behavioral Patterns of
Key Instigators. Even at ages 13, 14 and 15, this can be done
through proven Directive Counseling methods, such as William Glasser's Reality
Therapeutic Model. For gentler students in need of rerouting, Non-Directive
Therapies, such as the Rogerian approach are recommended. Students who exhibit
abnormal behaviors, whether they are compounded or not by Special Ed problems,
definitely respond to such therapeutic intervention. What has happened in
4. Parent-Teacher
Conferences are not to be ruled out as a means of determining the
root causes of discipline problems and of suggesting methods of enforcing rules
to which these students must adhere. Such conferences have limited impact in
the case of poorly educated or neglectful parents.
C O
N C L U S I O N
Obviously in a two day observational period,
serious analysis of the specific problems affecting this classroom can not be
expected. The stakes for society, nonetheless, are quite high. Most of these
often "redeemable" children may, in the future, because of inadequate
provisions being made for them now, be unable to operate cash registers,
function in normal social circles, earn an honest living or contribute to their
communities in constructive ways. A high percentage of improperly trained
special ed children will ultimately resort to petty crime, abusive behavior,
alcoholism, prostitution or substance abuse. Studies have shown that they spend
time in jail, in detention facilities, and create health and safety risks to
the community. Even in rural areas, many fall victim to more intelligent
criminals who organize and manipulate them for their own nefarious purposes.
By, at very least, making an effort to
salvage these 15 or 20 students, and particularly three of them, now under Ms.
Krummenacker's care, society will be spared hundreds of thousands of dollars in
damages at a later date. The foregoing recommendations might prove useful in helping
this dedicated instructor reverse some of the behavioral trends independently
observed by her guest-educator during these two half-day sessions.